Tuesday, 6 December 2011

Israelis Brand Criticism ‘Anti-Semitic’

In this morning’s ‘Enhanced Bullshit’ edition we bring you the latest and greatest in scandal-mongering hot gossip from Anarchy Central’s 24/7 Truth & Rumour Mill – with dispatches hand forged and crafted into bespoke satire to tempt the palates of all budding nihilists and career revolutionaries who carry the immortal bloodline of the rebel sons of Belial.

While the Kenyan cuckoo US President, Barky O’Barmy-Soetoro-Shabazz is conspicuously absent on a three week vacation in Hawaii, leaving the US economy to flounder in its death throes, the White House is being inundated with frenzied ultimatums from the rabid AIPAC and ADL ZioNazi groups demanding they sack Howard Gutman, the US envoy to Belgium, for having the audacity to dare tell the truth with regard to certain damning remarks he made last week concerning the wildfire spread of ‘anti-Semitism’ in Europe.

However, White House press secretary Mohammed ‘Fizzy’ al Kaseltzer informed media hacks that the ambassador was simply expressing a personal opinion that the Israeli leaders were the root cause of this problem due them being a bunch of belligerent homicidal psychopaths bent on warmongering.

Ambassador Gutman, who is himself as Jewish as Streit’s kosher matzo – plus being the son of a Holohoax survivor – and obviously an individual who can differential between the Israeli’s chutzpah-loaded rhetoric and good old common sense logic - opened his damning speech to a Brussels conference on anti-Semitism in Europe with a statement claiming the failure to resolve the 60-odd year old Middle East conflict, kick started with the illegal seizure of Palestine by Rothshite-funded kikester terrorists in 1948, is breeding a new type of bigotry that continues to expand at a geometric rate, and in which Jews are mistakenly being targeted due resentment over Zionist stubbornness underlying the continuation of the Arab-Israeli conflict – and the Knesset's pathetic attempts to justify and legitimise the indefensible.

"This simmering pot of discontent starts to boil over every time the Knesset announce they intend to withhold customs taxes from the Palestinian Authority as punitive punishment for them being accepted as a member of UNESCO – or for applying for statehood recognition by the United Nations.”
“The problem is compounded even further when Israel’s die-hard Jabotinskyist PM Bobo Nuttyahoo gives the go-ahead for the construction of yet another illegal settlement in Jerusalem or the occupied West Bank. This exacerbates the anti-Zionism sentiment and provides a setback here in Europe for those fighting hatred and bigotry – illustrated so perfectly with Western moralists adopting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israel.”

Meanwhile, back in the good ole US of A, anxious to attract as much Rothshite crime syndicate kikester funding as possible for his election campaign, Republican presidential candidate Mitt ‘Shit-for-Brains’ Romney accused Ambassador Gutman of downplaying anti-Semitism - without possessing even the slightest comprehension of what the term implies.

Not wishing to miss an opportunity to open his big gob and say something stupid, the 'other-other' Republican presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich - aka ‘the Grinch that would spoil Christmas by nuking Iran’ – always willing to prostitute his political clout for thirty pieces of silver – jumped onto the bandwagon to castigate Gutman for supplying moral and diplomatic ammunition to Israel’s critics and providing fuel for a rhetorical argument that the rogue state of Israel deserves the title of ‘global pariah’ due its intransigence concerning the long-ignored plight of ‘Palestine’ and it’s usurped and displaced population.

Conversely, this brouhaha has nothing to do with ‘anti-Semitism’ per se. The membership of the nutty Knesset is composed of Khazar-Ashkenazi Jews of convenience who have as much Semitic DNA in their genes as my goldfish, Seymour. Whereas the true and historic Semitic inhabitants / owners of what is termed the Holy Land / aka ‘Palestine’ are in fact the Arab Palestinians – Muslim and otherwise.

So, forget this ever-so convenience yet fatally-flawed anti-Semitism label that the kikesters have claimed as their own and stick on anyone who dares criticise Israeli’s abominable human rights and wrongs abuse record - or mentions that their catalogue of war crimes committed against the displaced Palestinian populations of the occupied West Bank and besieged Gaza Strip far surpasses that which they claim was committed against their number by Hitler’s Nazis.

While the common herd ain’t too smart and believe anything the press and goggle box media tell them, this 'anti-Semitism' / 'Hate the Jews' fiction is all hasbara (black propaganda) put around by the Israeli lobby to boost and perpetuate their cherished ‘victims’ status.
In all truth it’s down to ‘anti-Zionism’ and the fact that the imprudent letter from Arthur Balfour to Baron Walter Rothshite was used as an excuse to pursue their insane Chosen People / Manifest Destiny for the Greater Israel plot, graphically described in the forged prophetic Protocols of the Greedy Bastard Elders of Zion - and steal Palestine from the Palestinians in the 1948 Yawm an-Nakbah (Day of the Catastrophe) – the start of the Palestinian Holocaust.

Thought for the day: Well, at least Ambassador Gutman copping the undivided censorious attentions of the pro-Israeli lobbies, might just take the heat off Gilad Atzmon and stop them pillorying his ‘The Wandering Who?’ book for a while – although they do appear to have sufficient toxic venom stored to strike at all critics simultaneously.

Allergy warning: This article was written in a nut-infested area and may contain traces of lunacy and/or squirrel shit.

Rusty’s Skewed News Views (Purveyors of Bespoke Satire) - enhanced with a modest touch of Yeast Logic and a piquant dash of Political Incorrectness: a newsheet and media source not owned by Rupert Murdoch and the Masonic Zionist kikester lobby – and immune from litigation under the statutes of the ‘Fair Comment in the Public Interest’ defence.

No comments: