Monday, 24 January 2011

Israelis Brand Jewish Critic ‘Anti-Semite’

In this morning’s ‘Enhanced Bullshit’ edition we bring you the latest and greatest in scandal-mongering hot gossip from Anarchy Central’s 24/7 Truth & Rumour Mill – with dispatches hand forged and crafted into bespoke satire to tempt the palates of all budding nihilists and career revolutionaries who carry the immortal bloodline of the rebel sons of Belial.

The Rothshite Zionist crime syndicate-controlled UN Watch have gone into their usual ‘victims crying foul’ mode that kicks in whenever anyone or their dog dares to criticise the war-mongering Israelis - and are demanding the dismissal of the UN Human Rights Council’s Special Rapporteur on Palestine for having the audacity to question the official United States cover-up of 9/11 so painstakingly constructed by Kike Whitewash PR – and daring to raise the question “What was dem dirty dancin’ n hi-fivin’ Mossad removals men doin’ dere?”

The ‘Special Rapporteur’ the neurotic UN Watch's Executive Director, Kus Ima Shelcha (himself a member of Tel Aviv’s Half-Cock Brigade) wants fired just happens to be Richard Falk, himself a Jew, but one possessed by a moral conscience that will not allow the imprisonment in the biggest concentration camp on Earth of the population of the Gaza Strip, nor the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians to continue without condemnation and legal redress.

Falk’s highly critical statements regarding Israel's treatment of the Palestinians and his publicised opinion that Mossad and a sinister Zionist cabal of US military-industrial complex elitist conspirators were responsible for the 9/11 WTC and Pentagon terrorist attacks – and not Mohammed al Patsy and a gang of Jolly Jihadi Muslims - has spelled out political “Nightmare” with a capital N for Tel Aviv’s ruling kikesters.
The thing they fear most is to be faced with a prominent Jew in a position of sentinel authority to speak out about the brazen chutzpah and criminal misconduct of Israel due the fact the 'anti-Semite' label they usually hurl at their critics can't logically be applied – albeit the likes of Falk do get tagged as ‘self-hating Jews’ as a dismissive put-down.

To add some semblance of gusto to their demand for Falk’s dismissal from his UN post, the kikesters inside UN Watch have recruited the spineless toady West Bank leader Mahmoud Abbas to add his two-penneth of objections now Falk has stated for the public record that he recognises Hamas as the legitimately-elected political party to represent not only the Palestinian population of the Gaza Strip but also the West Bank, whose actual leadership has been usurped by Abbas’ Palestinian Lickarse Organisation – now composed of Knesset stooges.

On reflection, the Palestinian Authority’s newly acquired hostility towards Falk seems quite ironic as he was the preferred person they themselves nominated to be the UN Human Rights Council’s permanent investigator of Israeli human rights and war crimes violations in the Palestinian territories.

Today the UN Watch chief Kus Ima Shelcha went into a total frenzied spitting mode, demanding UN Sec’ General Ban Ki-Moon remove Richard Falk from office for breaching his mandate when he called this week for world economic and diplomatic sanctions against Israel and compared the Israelis and their abuses of the Palestinians – and specifically their Facility 1319 extraordinary rendition centre and Great Apartheid Walls - to Hitler’s Nazis and their ghettoes and concentration camps of the Happy Holohoax era.

Allergy warning: This article was written in a known propaganda-infested area and may contain traces of slight exaggeration, modest porkies, misaligned references and lashings of bush telegraph innuendo.

Oh, and by the way, fuck the Zionists and the outlaw state of Israel.

Rusty’s Skewed News Views (Purveyors of Bespoke Satire) enhanced with a modest touch of Yeast Logic and a piquant dash of Political Incorrectness: a newsheet and media source not owned by Rupert Murdoch and the Masonic Zionist kikester lobby – and immune from litigation under the statutes of the ‘Fair Comment in the Public Interest’ defence.

No comments: