Monday, 5 March 2012

UK Baby Snatching Adoption Syndicate

Once again, the latest and the greatest in scandal-mongering hot gossip from Anarchy Central’s 24/7 Truth & Rumour Mill – with dispatches hand forged and crafted into bespoke satire to tempt the palates of all budding nihilists and career revolutionaries who carry the immortal bloodline of the rebel sons of Belial.

In 2000 Tony ‘Trust Me’ Bliar amended New Labour’s approach to paedo’ pimping with a dynamic shift in policy and radically modified adoption targets to raise the number of children snatched from what ‘not fit for purpose’ social services would, in their infinite unqualified arrogance, brand as ‘unfit parents’ by 50% to 5,400 per annum.

With this flawed broad brush approach Bliar and his fellow child molesting pals Gordon ‘Incapability’ Brown and the flamboyant fudge artist Peter Scandalson – now Lord Scandalson of the Felchers (aka Vermin in Ermine) – established a deeply secretive system of in-camera closed courts that is purposely, and with conspiratorial malice aforethought, biased against decent families via the dishonest testimony of social workers bent on raking in their performance bonuses - and reams of questionable evidence submitted by doctors - which have wrongly condemned mothers of being unfit to perform the tasks of parentage.

Thus since the insidious scheme’s 2000 inception date, zillions of pounds of taxpayers' money have been doled to councils – not to fill in the ubiquitous potholes blighting our roads – but encourage them to meet the increased Government target figures on child adoptions – with an annual tally of 4,000 in England and Wales alone – and wholly ignoring what goes on in that inhospitable Masonic pederast’s paradise north of Hadrian’s Wall.

Figures recently released by the Department for Local Government and Community Cohesion name both Essex and Kent councils as entities who were paid £2 million quid apiece in performance bonuses over a three year period to encourage additional adoptions.
Cheshire, Hampshire, Gloucestershire and Norfolk were promised an extra £1 million nicker each in rewards to boost their kiddie snatching and adoption figures – with the true aim being for social workers to find permanent homes for difficult-to-place older children in care.

However, such is the human condition that motivated by greed and the promise of a limitless flow of ready cash in extra bonuses, venal council officials and social workers who would kneel before the altar of Mammon formed a corrupt network and began earmarking the cuddly newborn babes and cutie-pie toddlers that proved so easy to snatch from single teenage mothers via the medium of intimidation, coercion and threats of being sectioned - and assign to ready-canvassed adoptive parents catering to establishment pederast rings.

This practice of targeting the ‘valuable commodity’ progeny of dysfunctional young single mothers while they are still in the womb and ripe to be snatched at birth has thus resulted in leaving the more difficult-to-place older children in local care homes – a tragedy of graft and corruption with the number of over-seven-year olds being adopted now plummeting by half.

So, if we are to read between the lines of the report compiled by the Masonic Trust for Girls & Boys who carried out a socio-political moral impact study on the issue in 2011, what did Bliar’s Masonic masters set in motion by ordering him to implement their wicked scheme?
A bonus-driven foster / adoption care culture of child-snatching for profit - run by corruption-ridden local authorities and their Common Purpose-trained uniform fetishist Gestapo social service drones – all backed up by immoral secret courts manned by venal magistrates and judges with perverse sexual tastes - where the statutes of habeas corpus no longer apply and hence conceal the abuse from the public and media scrutiny and condemnation. Not so much a complete disgrace - but a disgrace with criminal undertones and implications. Basically, we’ve seen better organised riots.

Then at the opposite end of the polarised spectrum we have such incompetent lapses in social service efficiency, demonstrated by oversights and fubars concerning unfit carers as evidenced with the instances of the manky McCanns and the parents of Baby P – quite simply criminally unfit for purpose.

Thought for the day: ‘Masonic Trust for Girls & Boys’ – is somebody pulling my fucking leg here? ‘Trust’?

In light of Thomas Watt Hamilton – he of Dunblane notoriety and official paedo pimp to the Scottish Rite lodges - and the disgusting revelations now entered into the Annals of Infamy concerning the Aberdeen cover-up of the elitist Masonic kiddie fiddling ring involved in the Hollie Greig sexual abuse and serial rape case whose social services were complicit in pimping for the elitists’ ‘Special Needs School’ pederast’s bordello - we wouldn’t ‘trust’ this gang of child molesting perverts to take the dog a walk.

Anyone who has further doubts concerning the character flaws that demean and corrupt government establishment integrity, then Google up the Waterhouse Report, circa 2000 AD and the sordid tale of Bryn Estyn Children's Home in Wales where Police Chief Superintendent Gordon Anglesea and a legion of other perverted plods staged Satanic black mass rituals and sexually abused children in the company of ranking Freemason kiddie fiddlers – including bigwig scumbag Lord Alistair McAlpine, one of the many high-level Masonic paedo’s in power who escaped prosecution following fellow Mason Sir Ronald Waterhouse’s 3-year / £13 million quid investigation and ensuing whitewash / cover-up.

The Brotherhood’s credo: “By our acts shall Masonry be judged” – these people shame the memory of the Widow’s son.

Hmmm, social services out for profit and secret courts indeed - something stinks in Denmark – and it isn’t Hamlet’s socks.


Rusty’s Skewed News Views (Purveyors of Bespoke Satire) - enhanced with a modest touch of Yeast Logic and a piquant dash of Political Incorrectness: a newsheet and media source not owned by Rupert Murdoch and the Masonic Zionist kikester lobby – and immune from litigation under the statutes of the ‘Fair Comment in the Public Interest’ defence.

No comments: